
Features:
COLD DIFFUSION
by Kathleen Ricker, NCSA Science Writer
In the interstellar medium--the vast, low-density regions of space between the
stars--churn molecular clouds, turbulent masses of magnetized hydrogen gas and
dust that ultimately produce new stars. Molecular clouds are extremely cold
nebulae, with temperatures ranging from about -440 to -370 degrees Fahrenheit
and consist mostly of hydrogen molecules.
When parts of a molecular cloud eventually collapse because of gravitational
instability, they create a dense region warmer than the surrounding
interstellar medium. This region, called a protostar, continues to increase in
pressure and temperature until thermonuclear reactions at its core transform
it into a new star.
But why, despite the mass and temperature of hundreds of observed molecular
clouds in a given galaxy, don’t more of them simply collapse and form massive
starbursts? "That would mean we would see much higher star formation rates in
the galaxy than we actually observe," explains Fabian Heitsch, an
astrophysicist at the University of Wisconsin at Madison (UWM). Heitsch says
that, given the number of molecular clouds, one might expect to observe 200
newly forming stars per year, but actual observations only average around
three per year.
Molecular clouds have been thought to be stable because of, among other
things, the presence of magnetic fields, which, if sufficiently strong, could
prevent the molecular clouds from collapsing under their own gravity. The
interaction of magnetic fields with charged fluids (in this case, hydrogen) is
called magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). In previous simulations, Heitsch, together
with Mordecai-Mark Mac Low, Pakshing Li and Michael L. Norman, investigated
the role of turbulence and magnetic fields in preventing the collapse of
molecular clouds, relying heavily on NCSA's SGI Origin2000.
In his current work, Heitsch and his collaborators, Ellen Zweibel at UWM and
Adrianne Slyz at the University of Oxford, are investigating how magnetic
fields might diffuse in a turbulent environment, ultimately leading to the
collapse within the molecular cloud. Heitsch recently ran two-dimensional
simulations on NCSA's now-retired SGI Origin2000 and is currently preparing to
run three-dimensional simulations on Copper, the center's IBM p690.
WHEN THE NUMBERS DON'T ADD UP
In the interstellar medium, the magnetic field is essentially frozen to the
gas--a property referred to as flux freezing--such that the field strength
would be expected to increase on average if the gas is compressed. How long
the magnetic field can support the cloud depends on the strength of the field.
"If the field is very strong, it supports the cloud indefinitely," says
Heitsch, "and although the gas can move along the (straight) field lines, it
can not move perpendicular to them because of flux freezing, so we get a
sheetlike structure." But if the field is weak, Heitsch says, "the cloud would
collapse directly."
The magnetic field isn't necessarily homogeneous throughout the cloud. It can
be more intense in some regions of the clouds than in others, and especially,
it can be highly tangled by the turbulent motions of the cloud's gas.
According to the laws of physics, when the cloud, or part of the cloud,
collapses on itself, its mass should remain the same. The volume decreases,
while the density increases in proportion to the decrease in volume. As for
the magnetic flux, as the volume decreases, the magnetic lines are also
concentrated over a smaller area. Thus, the magnetic field should increase
with two-thirds power, along with the density.
However, says Heitsch, "observations of the magnetic field strength correlated
with the density in the interstellar medium show the relationship as very
flat. The magnetic field doesn’t change with increasing density." This
suggests that the magnetic flux-to-mass ratio in the molecular cloud is
actually decreasing, rather than holding steady.
How to explain the decrease? Of course, one could assemble molecular clouds by
gas flows along the field lines, in which case no correlation between the
magnetic field strength and the density would be observed. However, to reach
gas densities typical for molecular clouds, gas would have to be carried over
huge distances. The observed magnetic fields would be simply too weak to make
such an organized flow structure possible. Heitsch offers another possibility,
ambipolar diffusion, which causes charged particles to drift gradually out of
the cloud.
This answer by itself is not entirely adequate, though.
A SLOW LEAK
Within the molecular clouds are ions, which respond to magnetic fields, and
neutral atoms and molecules, which do not. Nevertheless, "if the medium is not
fully ionized, the neutral [particles] can feel the magnetic field’s
interaction with the [charged] particles," explains Heitsch, "so the ions
collide with the neutrals and drag the neutrals around."
It is these neutral particles, however, that cause the collapse of the cloud.
When the ionization decreases, and ions become fewer and fewer, "they don’t
collide with the neutrals anymore, and the neutrals start to decouple from the
ions and start to slip through the field lines," says Heitsch. This process is
known as ambipolar diffusion and, by itself, could result in the collapse of
the cloud.
Ambipolar diffusion, however, doesn’t happen quickly enough to explain the
loss of the magnetic field strength. The timescale required for it to occur
naturally and completely is anywhere between 100 million to a billion years,
which, according to Heitsch, is "far longer than any timescale on which
molecular clouds could form."
But, Heitsch wondered, could ambipolar diffusion operate at a faster rate than
is conventionally accepted? And if so, how?
ENTER TURBULENCE
The answer may lie in the molecular cloud's turbulence, which helps to provide
pressure in the absence of heat, but is also responsible for the gravitational
collapse of parts of a molecular cloud. This turbulence is supersonic, often
measuring at Mach 10, because the speed of sound in the dense interstellar
medium is extremely low. "As a result, the cloud is uneven throughout, with
higher concentration of gas in some regions, and, although the turbulence
might prevent the global collapse of the cloud, it promotes collapse locally,"
explains Heitsch.
In addition to providing the pressure necessary to maintain the cloud's
stability, turbulence can, however, also increase the ambipolar diffusion rate
by mixing the field to small scales. Heitsch simulated a two-dimensional
section of a molecular cloud to find out whether turbulence would indeed have
such an effect on diffusion and discovered that this was indeed the case. "We
can [now] diffuse the flux-to-mass ratio at a rate a factor of 10 or 100
higher than the standard diffusion rate, Heitsch says. "This would explain the
weak correlation between magnetic field strength and density in the
interstellar medium."
Heitsch has been using an extension of a gas-kinetic flux-splitting method
developed by Xu and Tang Xu in 1999 and 2000, which is especially useful for
investigating MHD problems including diffusive processes. A bit daunted by the
prospect of porting his code to a new machine when the Origin2000 neared
retirement, he was in for a pleasant surprise when he did his first test run.
"I was so impressed that I could take the code and compile it on the IBM p690
and it ran--that has never happened to me. That's the first time a code ran
quickly for me, which was very nice."
Heitsch is attempting to make his simulations progressively more and more
realistic. "The models so far are restricted because they're only two-
dimensional--the magnetic field is perpendicular to the flow plane, which is
the easiest, most tractable case." The next step, he says, is to create a
three-dimensional model. "I'm looking forward to the time when that will
happen, because that will be computationally very expensive--and very
exciting."
Funding statement
This research is funded by the National Science Foundation.
For further information:
http://lcd-www.colorado.edu/~heitsch/research.html#mhdturb.
|